Recently active topics

We are currently configuring and validating a BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access (PRA) ATLAS cluster running version 26.2.3 the new installation, and we would appreciate your assistance in clarifying some questions regarding Traffic Node selection and connectivity.Environment OverviewOur environment consists of three ATLAS appliances: Primary: atlasprimary.xx.xx – 10.10.1.10 Traffic Node 1: atlasnode1.xx.xx – 10.10.2.10 Traffic Node 2: atlasnode2.xx.xx – 10.10.4.10 The public access hostname is acessoremoto.xx.xx, which resolves to the Primary appliance. The cluster is configured and synchronized, the hostnames are configured, and the wildcard SSL certificate for *.xx.xxhas been installed. The Traffic Node selection method is currently set to Random.Issues and Questions When accessing https://acessoremoto.xx.xx/console, the Web Access Console displays a “Connect to” selector with the Primary and both Traffic Nodes available. Is this the expected behavior in PRA 26.2.3? Is there a

Hello All, I was referring this KBA article -Knowledge Article - Customer Support (KB0016945)In this its explained about the column ‘Mapped to User’. Do we know how this mapping is established. Is it something in Smart rule which helps in setting this mapping. Thanks,Prasad  

Hi all,We have deployed a BeyondTrust PRA Cloud instance through Pathfinder in one of our customers.Due to several users with personal accounts (e.g. Gmail), we are restricted in sharing with them the Microsoft My Apps link (with the Tenant ID) in order for them to click the BeyondTrust application.That’s ok; however, we observe that there is a minimum of three clicks for a user to reach the /console page (one on the Enterprise Application, one on the PRA application on Pathfinder, and then the Launch Privileged Web Access Console).I have selected the option to Redirect to the Privileged Web Access Console under Management > Site Configuration > HTTP, but I think this is for direct connections to the instance.No big deal, but just trying to figure out if there is a way to minimize the number of clicks for such a use case.Thanks all.

Hi there, currently i got some case request for one of my customers, their using 3 UVM 2016 in A/A deployment with BI version 25.1. they want to upgrade UVM 2016 to UVM 2022. is there any one that experiencing this upgrade scenario before ? because , i just planning  to add on new UVM 2022 as worker node first before enable the new UVM 2022 as an admin console before all UVM 2016 will be take down and dismantled. Thanks, and hope you are all have a great day a head.

Is anyone aware if the API can be used to approve or deny JIT Application requests. It looks like the API is able to handle this for JIT Admin. If no, has there been any word on when this could be coming. I’m in the process of building a mobile app for the JIT App approvals and the front end is done, but the pesky API backend is not cooperating.

Hi all,Environment:BeyondInsight / Password Safe on-premises, U-Series Appliance, version[26.3.x – confirm build] Deployment:[ Active-Passive HA ] Managed servers: Windows and Linux, spread across multiple VLANs RDP/SSH sessions go through the Password Safe session proxy, with recording and Change Password After Release enabledOur challenge: Admins can still bypass Password Safe and connect to servers directly with mstsc.exe or PuTTY. Those sessions aren't requested, approved or recorded. Our current setup:GPO adds regular accounts to local Administrators. Restricted Groups / GPP add domain groups containing admins' regular (non-privileged) accounts to the local Administrators group on servers. Servers are spread across multiple VLANs. Admin workstation VLANs can route to server VLANs, and inter-VLAN rules allow TCP 3389/22. Default RDP logon rights. Any member of local Administrators can log on through Remote Desktop.Questions:Does BeyondTrust have an official recommendation or harden

I am facing an issue while launching PS_Automate through CMD.Initially, there was no issue when I tested it with the default BIWebApp.ini file. However, after making a copy of the same file and renaming it to WAF.ini, I started receiving the following error when trying to launch PS_Automate:Error: Subscript used on non-accessible variable.My BeyondInsight/Password Safe version is 26.2.Could anyone please guide me on what might be causing this issue and how I can troubleshoot or resolve it? 

Is it possible to deploy jumpoint across 2 sites - from jumpoints in PROD/DR the target systems are accessible, is that enough or should it be same VLAN as well?

Hello, I was wondering if anyone else is having any issues with logging into the Remote Support representative console after updating to macOS 27 Golden Gate?We are a small team, but so far we have four people who have updated, and currently two of them are not able to sign in. There is a spinning wheel for about 10-15 seconds after clicking login, and then it just stays on the authentication page as if nothing happened. Reinstalling the program doesn’t help, and we also tried using the following command:sudo tccutil reset All com.bomgar.bomgar-sccThis would allow one successful login, however the issue would happen again the net time we tried to login. 

The release notes for 26.3 mention that JIT Admin notifications have been added so users know right away that they have been approved/denied without needing to constantly check the endpoint utility app. It explicitly says JIT Admin. Does anyone know offhand if those notifications have been added for JIT Application approvals? 

Hi. We have a default Group Policy for all support teams that gives access to all jump clients. The policy applies to all members of our tenant, using the tenant ID. Is there a way to exclude specific agents so that the policy does not apply to them? I want to set up a separate Group Policy only for one agent to have access to only a very limited number of jump clients, but I can’t if they are already a member of the default group because they are a tenant member.

Has anybody here ever implemented Qualys scanning against their PS on-premises appliances? Is it possible to create a local account for Qualys on our on-prem appliances for Qualys scanning or is this not allowed?

Hello,I have a CloudShare Based Windows Server 2022 VM with EPM Client, Adapter and Package Manager installed. It is visible in Pathfinder as connected, up to date, with the right policy assigned. When I update policy at the endpoint it says the latest available version is present. I am using default Workstyles (High, Medium and Low Flexibility) and created one user (at the endpoint) for each Workstyle. I defined filters with the specific user names and SID’s in each workstyle. However, the policy seems to have no effect.I compared behaviour of High and Low Flexibility account. I tried installing basic software (e.g. 7-zip) - both are getting error: Access is denied. I tried running regedit - both run it, but have access denied to the same entries. I tried creating a new folder in Program Files, and got Access Denied. The Analytics tab in Pathfinder shows no activity at all. In short - everything acts if EPM was not there at all, although all connectivity seems to be fine.I suspect I m

Hello Beekeepers community!!!We currently add Active Directory (AD) users to local BT Group security groups for access management. However, we have identified a concern regarding user lifecycle management and audit compliance.At present, when a user account is disabled or becomes inactive in Active Directory, the user is not automatically removed from the local group(s) to which access was previously granted. As a result, the group membership does not accurately reflect the list of active users.For example:Local group: BT-PAM-ACCESS Total members displayed: 10 users Actual active users: 8 users Disabled users in AD: 2 usersEven though the 2 users are disabled in Active Directory, they continue to appear as members of the local group. During audits, we provide screenshots of the local group membership as evidence of access reviews. This results in audit evidence showing all 10 users, which can be misleading because it includes accounts that are no longer active.Concern: The current proc

Hey all, I’m looking to optimize how we use BeyondInsight/Password Safe Managed Account Propagation Settings and would love to get your input. Right now, we want to automate password rotations for our domain service accounts without accidentally breaking dependencies like Windows Services, Scheduled Tasks, or IIS App Pools. I’m curious to know exactly how the propagation engine behaves under the hood in your environments?What specific use cases you’re leveraging it for and most importantly, what configurations or operational habits you’ve put in place to ensure 100% consistent results without missing target servers or causing service downtime. So, how are you guys handling this successfully?

Is there any way to change IP address of already onboarded assets to Beyondtrust password safe? everytime we have to delete the older asset and then re-onboard the asset.

In BeyondTrust Password Safe, Cloud  why are some manually added assets unable to change the assigned workgroup? The option appears unavailable & disabled.  

Hi all,Just want to check, does anyone have the official slide deck for the BeyondTrust Password Safe solution from BeyondTrust?Thanks.